Government should be local, city, county, state, and THEN federal

Smaller Government

A good chunk of the arguments made by both Democrats and Republicans as it pertains to government is the Establishment’s need to increase the power of Washington DC. Centralized government was a fear of the founding fathers and was intended to be limited as much as possible, but in the modern political atmosphere of our country, the push for universal rules across the nation has been steadily growing for decades.

As we form the foundation of a new political party, it’s important to keep one thing squarely in mind: American government functions best when it’s inverted. It starts within a household and/or family before the concept of “government” itself is even introduced into most conversations. The liberties promised to the individual and the values set forth within a family or household should stand at the top of a government hierarchy. Next would come the local government, followed by city, county, state, and finally leaving the “leftovers” to the federal government itself.

In other words, the federal government should stay focused on those things that only it can realistically control such as the military, interstate law enforcement, and foreign affairs. Otherwise, the “lower” levels of government should be given higher authority.

This isn’t a patriotic yet impossible concept that attempts to bring us back to the days when someone was a Virginian before they were an American. National patriotism and the importance of federal government doesn’t need to be diminished. However, it has been granted far too much power over issues that it simply has no business involving itself in.

Let’s look at an obvious example: minimum wage. The Democrats are pushing for a national minimum wage of $15/hour and Donald Trump has floated the idea of a $10/hour minimum. Both concepts are ludicrous. The national minimum wage should be $0. If states then want to take on the issue, they can, but we wouldn’t recommend it. Counties could do it and that would make sense. Then, individual cities and local governments can choose to extend their minimum wage a bit higher than the county level based upon the needs of the community. This type of system makes much more sense because it allows communities to balance their needs to attract businesses with their needs to maintain a wages against the local poverty lines.

When in doubt, defer down the government chain. That should be standard operating procedure in America. When you take on issues at a federal level, you take the very high risk of destroying the systems you’re trying to protect. $15/hour in Cross Lanes, WV, has a completely different impact on businesses and people than it does in Seattle, WA.

Here’s the problem and it’s systemic. It’s one of the biggest reasons that we’re forming the new party instead of trying to fix the GOP from within. The political system in its current form is one that favors top-down governing. For Democrats, the concept of bottom-up governance is obtuse. For most Republicans, it’s both a campaign promise to be broken and an excuse used to hide from issues. “Let the states decide” should be a rallying cry, not a cop out. Members of both parties have a status quo to maintain that includes big government and federal intervention.

Our new party will fight tooth and nail to change the mentality of Washington DC. It won’t be easy, decades of big government advocacy has corrupted the system and swayed the sentiment of those within it, but when enough people cry out in one voice that enough is enough, we can affect change that sticks.

If you want to receive updates about the new conservative party of if you have questions, email me – [email protected] – or fill out the form below.

[gravityform id=”1″ title=”true” description=”true” ajax=”true”]

Here’s a brief video to gain an understanding of what our future should include. These are the values that a new party should adopt.

JD Rucker

JD Rucker is Editor of this site as well as Soshable, a Federalist Christian Blog. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, and co-founder of the Federalist Party. Find him on Twitter or Facebook.

1 Comment
  1. That’s exactly the problem.

    The alphabet soup of beauracracies is more smothering to our freedom than King George and they are not our elected representatives. They are headquartered far away in DC to give us little to no contact or recourse. Basically this is rule without representation. The BLM, EPA, and IRS are the tip of the iceberg. Then add to that mess the current “czars”, executive mandates and departmental intimidation. What is the difference between a pen and phone way of ruling and a king???? Make no mistake they are ruling us – not leading, not governing – ruling. I like the thought of un-legislators. Get rid of laws and rules, don’t make more so you can justify your existence.

    Then the judges. They’re either appointed or elected. If appointed they are beholding to the party to sustain their position and salary. I don’t know about other places but here, to find out anything about a judge on a ballot is like pulling hens teeth. It’s like voting blind.

    That’s why I think we could write up a list of grievances similar to our Declaration that people could sign on to as members and certainly as party candidates.

    As an aside, if states didn’t issue marriage licenses the feds couldn’t tell them who to issue them to. What’s the point anyway? They are another form of social engineering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

© 2017 The New Americana